Hi HIlmar
Thanks for the pull request. I've pushed a few extra changes in Salsa, and
I'm uploading version 1.25 now.
Cheers
--
Danai
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 07:12, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Am 21.01.2023 um 16:05 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit:
>
> Hi Danai,
>
> > Indeed, I have tested it
Am 21.01.2023 um 16:05 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit:
Hi Danai,
Indeed, I have tested it yesterday too and the scripts now breeze through
without bailing out.
I would like to keep the bug, and will solve it by adding a versioned
build-dependency on Fontforge to ensure it will always build
Hi Hilmar
Indeed, I have tested it yesterday too and the scripts now breeze through
without bailing out.
I would like to keep the bug, and will solve it by adding a versioned
build-dependency on Fontforge to ensure it will always build properly.
Cheers
--
Danai
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 15:14,
Am 20.12.2022 um 04:08 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit:
Hi,
Sorry, I forgot all about this!
I figured out it was a regression so in Unstable you need to go two
versions back for Fontforge, which will ignore the warnings instead of
halting the process.
I'll be back home on 30 December.
Ho Hilmar
Sorry, I forgot all about this!
I figured out it was a regression so in Unstable you need to go two
versions back for Fontforge, which will ignore the warnings instead of
halting the process.
I'll be back home on 30 December.
Meanwhile I'll send a message upstream.
Thanks for
Am 27.07.2022 um 12:10 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit:
Hi Danai,
is there progress? Did you get response from upstream?
Hilmar
Some observations:
Going back to fontforge version 20201107~dfsg-4 and its dependencies, I
notice the following warning message:
21900/1114292:
Add extrema...
Some observations:
Going back to fontforge version 20201107~dfsg-4 and its dependencies, I
notice the following warning message:
21900/1114292:
Add extrema...
Simplifying outlines...
NaN value in spline creationNaN value in spline creationNaN value in spline
creationNaN value in spline
Very interesting; font bkai gets stuck during the fontforge compilation at
21900/1114292 and stays at 100% CPU usage. Other fonts seem fine.
This requires a bit more investigating. My gut tells me the recent
fontforge upload has a regression somewhere.
--
Danai
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 22:42,
Thanks Lucas, I'll look at it tonight.
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022, 22:04 Lucas Nussbaum, wrote:
> Source: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic
> Version: 1.24
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During
Source: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic
Version: 1.24
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Reading
10 matches
Mail list logo
