Bug#1019521: blhc: False positive for Qt6 moc

2022-12-21 Thread Eriberto
Em qua., 21 de dez. de 2022 às 11:23, Simon Ruderich escreveu: > Hi Ross, > > thanks for the patch. Looks good. Pushed to [1]. > > Best, > Simon > > [1] > https://ruderich.org/simon/gitweb/?p=blhc/blhc.git;a=commitdiff;h=018466d7ddd9c78f1e1efbafbb7be2f969e1bbd1 Thanks Simon.

Bug#1019521: blhc: False positive for Qt6 moc

2022-12-21 Thread Simon Ruderich
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:00:56AM -0300, Eriberto wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Could you check the patch below? > > Regards, > > Eriberto > > Em qua., 21 de dez. de 2022 às 03:51, Ross Vandegrift > escreveu: >> >> Package: blhc >> Version: 0.13-2 >> Followup-For: Bug #1019521 >> X-Debbugs-Cc:

Bug#1019521: blhc: False positive for Qt6 moc

2022-12-21 Thread Eriberto
Hi Simon, Could you check the patch below? Regards, Eriberto Em qua., 21 de dez. de 2022 às 03:51, Ross Vandegrift escreveu: > > Package: blhc > Version: 0.13-2 > Followup-For: Bug #1019521 > X-Debbugs-Cc: rvandegr...@debian.org > > Hello, > > I also ran into this- moc is now at

Bug#1019521: blhc: False positive for Qt6 moc

2022-12-20 Thread Ross Vandegrift
Package: blhc Version: 0.13-2 Followup-For: Bug #1019521 X-Debbugs-Cc: rvandegr...@debian.org Hello, I also ran into this- moc is now at /usr/lib/qt6/libexec/moc. I think the attached patch should address this. Thanks, Ross -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers