Thanks for the reply.

On 11/11/2022 13:49, stefa...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Jerome (2022.11.11_12:23:42_+0000)
Fixing the #1020747 may avoid FTBFS for some packages.
I proposed a solution to fix it, however I cannot say if it optimal.

That patch looks reasonable to me. I'd have done the [:3] inside the
tuple(), but that's not exactly a problem.

I will try to step forward by the end of the week-end if no one else
do it before.

Cheers,
Jerome


SR


--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5  A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to