I opened up another MR. It has a detailed explanation of the changes,
including an updated patch.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I opened MRs that contain a DFSG clean update.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 2:05:21 AM MST Bastian Germann wrote:
> Am 19.10.22 um 00:43 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
> > Because this Lintian error existed in the previous packages and because it
> > does not relate the RC bug that this upload is attempting to fix I was
> > planning to wait for a
On Wednesday, October 19, 2022 2:00:23 AM MST Bastian Germann wrote:
> Am 19.10.22 um 00:52 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
> > I very carefully looked though all the files in the source and the output
> > of licensecheck to create the copyright file. If you compare it to the
> > copyright file from
Am 19.10.22 um 00:43 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
Because this Lintian error existed in the previous packages and because it does not relate the RC bug that this upload
is attempting to fix I was planning to wait for a future release to fix it. Do you think it would be best to deal with
it now
Am 19.10.22 um 00:52 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
I very carefully looked though all the files in the source and the output of licensecheck to create the copyright file.
If you compare it to the copyright file from 4.0.9-1 you will see that it is much improved and fixes many inaccuracies
that
For some reason, the plain text version of my previous email cut of the end
(although it was
included in the HTML version). I am sending just that part again in hopes it
goes through in
both plain text and HTML.
> On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:41:51 PM MST Bastian Germann wrote:
> The
On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:41:51 PM MST Bastian Germann wrote:
> Okay, those tests can fail. Still there is some stuff to do on the package:
> Please fix the reprotest at
> https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/jobs/3398402, which
> used to passed
Do you know why this is
Okay, those tests can fail. Still there is some stuff to do on the package:
Please fix the reprotest at
https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/jobs/3398402, which used to
passed,
and the lintian errors at
https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/jobs/3398403:
E:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "electrum":
* Package name : electrum
Version : 4.3.2-0.1
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : https://electrum.org/
* License
10 matches
Mail list logo
