Scott Talbert writes:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2022, Keith Packard wrote:
>
>> Scott Talbert writes:
>>
>>> @Keith, do you have time to upload this patch? Unfortunately, this is
>>> blocking a large number of packages from migrating to testing.
>>> Alternatively, any objections to an NMU?
>>
>> Thanks
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022, Keith Packard wrote:
Scott Talbert writes:
@Keith, do you have time to upload this patch? Unfortunately, this is
blocking a large number of packages from migrating to testing.
Alternatively, any objections to an NMU?
Thanks for the NMU! Did you happen to create a git
Scott Talbert writes:
> @Keith, do you have time to upload this patch? Unfortunately, this is
> blocking a large number of packages from migrating to testing.
> Alternatively, any objections to an NMU?
Thanks for the NMU! Did you happen to create a git repo with this
change? I just noticed
Scott Talbert writes:
> @Keith, do you have time to upload this patch? Unfortunately, this is
> blocking a large number of packages from migrating to testing.
> Alternatively, any objections to an NMU?
I didn't get to this today, and might not until thursday or
friday. Happy for your to NMU
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
* Sebastian Ramacher [221129 11:21]:
Source: cmark-gfm
Version: 0.29.0.gfm.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
* Sebastian Ramacher [221129 11:21]:
> Source: cmark-gfm
> Version: 0.29.0.gfm.6-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cmark-gfm=s390x=0.29.0.gfm.6-2=1666810004=0
>
Source: cmark-gfm
Version: 0.29.0.gfm.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cmark-gfm=s390x=0.29.0.gfm.6-2=1666810004=0
--- expected HTML
+++ actual HTML
@@ -7,15 +7,15 @@
7 matches
Mail list logo