Bug#1023638: memtest86+: README.Debian: wrong file names for EFI images

2022-11-08 Thread Felix Zielcke
Control: tag -1 pending

Am Dienstag, dem 08.11.2022 um 07:28 +0100 schrieb Michael Prokop:
> Package: memtest86+
> Version: 6.00-1
> Severity: minor
> 
> Quoting from /usr/share/doc/memtest86+/README.Debian:
> 
> > Multiple binary images are provided:
> > 
> >   - A legacy bios 32bit /boot/memtest86+x32.bin that uses Linux
> > zImage
> >     boot protocol.
> > 
> >   - A legacy bios 64bit /boot/memtest86+x64.bin that uses Linux
> > zImage
> >     boot protocol.
> > 
> >   - A 32bit EFI Image /boot/memtest86+x32.bin
> > 
> >   - A 64bit EFI Image /boot/memtest86+x64.bin
> 
> Those are twice the same file names (e.g. /boot/memtest86+x64.bin),
> I suppose the later ones are meant to refer to
> /boot/memtest86+x32.efi + /boot/memtest86+x64.efi?
> 
> regards
> -mika-


Thanks for the hint.
Fixed in git for next upload



Bug#1023638: memtest86+: README.Debian: wrong file names for EFI images

2022-11-07 Thread Michael Prokop
Package: memtest86+
Version: 6.00-1
Severity: minor

Quoting from /usr/share/doc/memtest86+/README.Debian:

| Multiple binary images are provided:
| 
|   - A legacy bios 32bit /boot/memtest86+x32.bin that uses Linux zImage
| boot protocol.
| 
|   - A legacy bios 64bit /boot/memtest86+x64.bin that uses Linux zImage
| boot protocol.
| 
|   - A 32bit EFI Image /boot/memtest86+x32.bin
| 
|   - A 64bit EFI Image /boot/memtest86+x64.bin

Those are twice the same file names (e.g. /boot/memtest86+x64.bin),
I suppose the later ones are meant to refer to
/boot/memtest86+x32.efi + /boot/memtest86+x64.efi?

regards
-mika-