Hi Axel,
On 15-01-2023 23:07, Axel Beckert wrote:
TL;DR:
[...]
You're awesome. And indeed, what a shame of your time.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hi,
TL;DR:
The in-sbin-confusion-in-elf test in Lintian's test suite is broken
beyond repair: Lintian's arm64 result (which failed the test) is
actually the correct result, and the amd64 result (which passed the
test) is wrong due false negatives which lintian has no
Hi,
On 02-01-2023 21:10, Axel Beckert wrote:
Another weird point seems that
t/recipes/checks/desktop/gnome/gir/gir/eval/desc says:
Testname: gir
Check: desktop/gnome/gir
Test-Architecture: amd64
So that clearly means it should only be run on amd64. So why is it run
on arm64 at all?
Hi Paul,
finally found time to tackle this.
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Can you please investigate the situation
>
> Already done. Issue are mostly hardcoded x86_64 and amd64 strings in
> the test suite.
>
> Problem is IIRC that Lintian's testsuite currently doesn't support a
> templating system,
Control: found -1 2.115.3
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 10-12-2022 22:55, Axel Beckert wrote:
Ehm, that version no more in the archive anywhere. Did you maybe mean
2.115.3 as currently in Testing and Unstable? (Feel free to remove the
moreinfo tag once this is clarified.)
I meant, I see the
Control: tag -1 + confirmed moreinfo
Hi Paul,
Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: lintian
> Version: 2.111.0
Ehm, that version no more in the archive anywhere. Did you maybe mean
2.115.3 as currently in Testing and Unstable? (Feel free to remove the
moreinfo tag once this is clarified.)
> Your
Source: lintian
Version: 2.111.0
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails currently
everywhere except on amd64. Can you please investigate the situation and
fix it? I copied some of
7 matches
Mail list logo
