Am Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 09:05:28AM +0100 schrieb Drew Parsons:
> On 2023-02-07 08:33, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > Hi Drew
> >
> > I think python3-scipy should declare a Breaks on python3-skbio less
> > than the version in unstable (0.5.8-3).
> > This should sort out the autopkgtest regressions of
On 2023-02-07 08:33, Graham Inggs wrote:
Hi Drew
I think python3-scipy should declare a Breaks on python3-skbio less
than the version in unstable (0.5.8-3).
This should sort out the autopkgtest regressions of emperor,
python-skbio itself, q2-metadata and q2-quality-control, which are all
Hi Drew
I think python3-scipy should declare a Breaks on python3-skbio less
than the version in unstable (0.5.8-3).
This should sort out the autopkgtest regressions of emperor,
python-skbio itself, q2-metadata and q2-quality-control, which are all
passing in unstable, and allow scipy and
On 2023-01-27 10:25, Andreas Tille wrote:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1=scikit-learn
scikit-learn looks like it should manageable.
I've uploaded scipy 1.10 to unstable now.
Drew
Am Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 07:51:23PM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer:
> Control: tags 1029701 fixed-upstream
>
> Full log:
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/s/scikit-learn/30693526/log.gz
>
> There appear to be at least 2 separate failures here, both known and
> probably
Control: tags 1029701 fixed-upstream
Full log:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/s/scikit-learn/30693526/log.gz
There appear to be at least 2 separate failures here, both known and
probably fixed upstream. So yes, 'new upstream version' is the first
thing to try, but
6 matches
Mail list logo
