On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 18:47:04 +0100 Florian Ernst
wrote:
Of course, updating to 0.21.2 with its "273 changed files with 70,410
additions and 1,392 deletions"[0] feels rather invasive this late in the
Debian release cycle, so maybe a more targeted fix could be extracted.
These files are mostly
Hi Lucas,
maybe @dkg has time to update the packaging ?
Regards, Tim
On 14.01.23 23:51, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi Tim,
I can't find that new version (0.21.2) in Debian?
Lucas
On 14/01/23 at 20:19 +0100, Tim Rühsen wrote:
Hey Lucas,
could you try with the latest release v0.21.2 ?
I am
Hi Tim,
I can't find that new version (0.21.2) in Debian?
Lucas
On 14/01/23 at 20:19 +0100, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> Hey Lucas,
>
> could you try with the latest release v0.21.2 ?
>
> I am working on Debian sid, and can't reproduce the issue.
>
> But I will examine the logs and/or try to build
Hey Lucas,
could you try with the latest release v0.21.2 ?
I am working on Debian sid, and can't reproduce the issue.
But I will examine the logs and/or try to build from the debian sources
(in the next days).
Regards, Tim
On 14.01.23 13:59, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libpsl
Version:
Source: libpsl
Version: 0.21.0-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230113 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
5 matches
Mail list logo
