Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt

2023-02-03 Thread Martin Hostettler
[upstream here]

On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 16:13:41 +0100 Norwid Behrnd  wrote:
> > So long for a library, change the name.

I don't see why library may not have a descriptive name instead of a short
and cryptic one.

And the debian package name follows the name of the library it contains.
Which is by its pkg-config name: PosixSignalManager

Yes, some may find that ugly and long, but it's the libraries name, and
discussions on if that name is good should be held upstream.

I'm not aware of any debian policy the package name might violate.

Also this is a upload to package that recently entered testing but did not
build for various release architectures due to tests build on amd64 centric
assumptions, which should now be fixed. I think it's important to try to
help debian to offer packages on as many architectures as feasable.

> 
> It might be better to rename the package after bookworm became stable.
> 

Given how near we are in the release cycle to the freeze for new packages
to enter testing i agree that **if** the name needs changing it is more
feasable to do that targeting bookworm+1, but i still think that the
name is fine.



Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt

2023-02-02 Thread Norwid Behrnd
> So long for a library, change the name.

It might be better to rename the package after bookworm became stable.

My intent is to rename `ruby-mdl` into `markdownlint`; like
`posixsignalmanager`, it is a package accepted into `testing` a couple of
days ago.  The recommendation I received was to stick with the odd name *for
now*, and to defer attempts to rename the package, or else face the possibility
that neither one form (i.e., old name, or new name) would ship.[1]  Because
the soft-freeze of `bookworm` merely is a few days ahead (February 12).[2]

With these options ahead, I choose to stick (for now) with the name already
introduced.  It might be the safer choice for Christoph, too.

Regards,

Norwid

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2023/01/msg00058.html
[2] https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html



Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt

2023-02-02 Thread Mezgani Ali
The name of the package is bad.


So long for a library, change the name.

Regards,

Mezgani Ali
+212 6 44 17 94 51
ali.mezg...@nativelabs.ma
https://wiki.debian.org/mezgani

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Active member of IETF, GNU, Debian, FreeBSD and Kernel.
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ 
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ 
⠈⠳⣄⠀





> On 02/02/2023, at 15:10, Christoph Hueffelmann  wrote:
> 
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "posixsignalmanager":
> 
> * Package name : posixsignalmanager
>   Version  : 0.3-2
>   Upstream contact : Martin Hostettler 
> * URL  : https://github.com/textshell/posixsignalmanager
> * License  : BSL-1.0
> * Vcs  : [fill in URL of packaging vcs]
>   Section  : libs
> 
> The source builds the following binary packages:
> 
>  libposixsignalmanager0a - posix signal handling for qt - shared library
>  libposixsignalmanager-dev - posix signal handling for qt - headers
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
> URL:
> 
>  https://mentors.debian.net/package/posixsignalmanager/
> 
> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
> 
>  dget -x 
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/posixsignalmanager/posixsignalmanager_0.3-2.dsc
> 
> Changes since the last upload:
> 
> posixsignalmanager (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>   * debian/patches: Add upstream patch: Build fixes for non x86 architectures.
> 
> 
> We hope that we can now fix the broken architectures in the debian ci for our 
> packages.
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
>  Christoph Hueffelmann
> 



Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt

2023-02-02 Thread Christoph Hueffelmann

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "posixsignalmanager":

 * Package name : posixsignalmanager
   Version  : 0.3-2
   Upstream contact : Martin Hostettler 
 * URL  : https://github.com/textshell/posixsignalmanager
 * License  : BSL-1.0
 * Vcs  : [fill in URL of packaging vcs]
   Section  : libs

The source builds the following binary packages:

  libposixsignalmanager0a - posix signal handling for qt - shared library
  libposixsignalmanager-dev - posix signal handling for qt - headers

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/posixsignalmanager/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/posixsignalmanager/posixsignalmanager_0.3-2.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

 posixsignalmanager (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * debian/patches: Add upstream patch: Build fixes for non x86 
architectures.



We hope that we can now fix the broken architectures in the debian ci 
for our packages.


Regards,
--
  Christoph Hueffelmann