Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

2023-02-10 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 13:12:35 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Assuming package dependencies ensure that a new gnome-shell will result > in removal of incompatible extensions (which they do, if extension maintainers package extensions the same way the GNOME team does) > a standalone src+bin

Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

2023-02-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 10:58:00PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: >... > ..I don't think for this case it matters whetever an extension is part > of an aggregated package or not: > > * if it's a standalone src+bin package, the extension would have an RC > bug and would eventually be removed

Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

2023-02-09 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi Simon, On 2/9/23 14:50, Simon McVittie wrote: > My understanding from the changelog is that the maintainer Daniel Baumann > first packaged a bunch of GNOME Shell extensions according to the GNOME > team's usual convention (one package per independent upstream project), > and then was asked by

Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

2023-02-09 Thread Simon McVittie
My understanding from the changelog is that the maintainer Daniel Baumann first packaged a bunch of GNOME Shell extensions according to the GNOME team's usual convention (one package per independent upstream project), and then was asked by the ftp team to replace them with a single package

Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

2023-02-09 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi Jeremy On 2/9/23 13:15, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > I am lowering the severity of this bug to allow these extensions to > reach Debian 12. thanks you, that is very reasonable as it gives us a bit more time. please let me re-iterate that I'm perfectly fine with whatever consensus is reached between

Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

2023-02-09 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important I am lowering the severity of this bug to allow these extensions to reach Debian 12. I do still think this is RC for Unstable because of how it breaks user experiences when new GNOME major releases (like 43 to 44) happen but that won't happen for Stable. A major

Bug#1030683: Fwd: Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

2023-02-06 Thread Daniel Baumann
fwd, seems not to have made it to the bts Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 00:49:42 +0100 From: Daniel Baumann Reply-To: m...@daniel-baumann.ch To: Jeremy Bícha CC: Thorsten Alteholz , 1030

Bug#1030683: Fwd: Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

2023-02-06 Thread Daniel Baumann
fwd, seems not to have made it to the bts Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 17:01:27 +0100 From: Daniel Baumann Reply-To: m...@daniel-baumann.ch To: Jeremy Bícha , Thorsten Alteholz CC: 1030

Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

2023-02-06 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi everybody, - There is no upstream that bundles these extensions together like this. there is almost no upstream who creates Debian packages and yet Debian does it. - There is no unifying theme for why these extensions are included and why others are not included, except perhaps these

Bug#1030683: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: unmaintainable

2023-02-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: gnome-shell-extensions-extra Version: 20230205-2 Severity: serious Justification: unsupportable Tags: sid bookworm X-Debbugs-CC: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org gnome-shell-extensions-extra is a new collection of 6 different source packages bundled into a single source package with a