On Thu, 23 Feb 2023, Bastian Germann wrote:
Thanks for the QA work!
Thank you for that and your support!
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 18:58:49 +0100 Thomas Uhle
wrote:
> + Put libdbus-c++-ecore-1.so.* and libdbus-c++-glib-1.so.* in their own
>binary packages libdbus-c++-ecore-1-0 and libdbus-c++-glib-1-0 resp.
>to avoid pulling in e.g. Ecore
Am 15.02.23 um 19:25 schrieb Thomas Uhle:
After reverting the split of the package libdbus-c++-1v5 into seperate packages and assuming the
other updates make their way into bookworm just in time, would it then make sense to wait until the
release of bookworm to prepare another revision of
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 18:58:49 +0100 Thomas Uhle
wrote:
+ Put libdbus-c++-ecore-1.so.* and libdbus-c++-glib-1.so.* in their own
binary packages libdbus-c++-ecore-1-0 and libdbus-c++-glib-1-0 resp.
to avoid pulling in e.g. Ecore
Dear mentors,
I have forgotten to mention that AFAICS libdbus-c++-dev is the only binary
package in Debian that depends on the libraries libdbus-c++-ecore-1.so.0
and/or libdbus-c++-glib-1.so.0. So the introduction of the separate
packages libdbus-c++-ecore-1-0 and libdbus-c++-glib-1-0 does
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the dbus-c++ package:
* Package name : dbus-c++
Version : 0.9.0-11
Upstream contact :
* URL or Web page : http://sourceforge.net/projects/dbus-cplusplus/
* License : LGPL-2.1,
6 matches
Mail list logo
