On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 9:51 AM Pablo Mazzini wrote:
> I don't see other distributions (such as Fedora) having x-d-p-gnome as a
> dependency of gnome-session.
While it's interesting to see how other distros handle complex
integration issues, I don't think this is a convincing point.
>
I don't see other distributions (such as Fedora) having x-d-p-gnome as a
dependency of gnome-session.
Shouldn't the user be able to choose to have a minimal setup without the
support for it?
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 10:59 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 10:32:23 +0100, Pablo
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 10:32:23 +0100, Pablo Mazzini wrote:
> > Therefore, the desktop session needs to depend on the portal that has the
> > best integration.
>
> Why does this dependency needs to be specified in the gnome-session package?
> Wouldn't gnome-core be a better place to specify this?
> Therefore, the desktop session needs to depend on the portal that has the
best integration.
Why does this dependency needs to be specified in the gnome-session
package? Wouldn't gnome-core be a better place to specify this?
> I am really struggling to see how the benefit of having one less
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 6:51 PM Pablo Mazzini wrote:
> gnome-session can work properly without xdg-desktop-portal-gnome.
>
> As per the policy:
> Depends: This declares an absolute dependency.
> Recommends: This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.
>
> Please recommend
Package: gnome-session
Severity: normal
gnome-session can work properly without xdg-desktop-portal-gnome.
As per the policy:
Depends: This declares an absolute dependency.
Recommends: This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.
Please recommend xdg-desktop-portal-gnome.
The
6 matches
Mail list logo
