On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 03:13:05PM +0200, Guy Durrieu wrote:
> Yes it does.
Thanks for testing.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Hi Guy,
On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 03:13:05PM +0200, Guy Durrieu wrote:
> Le 02/04/2023 à 12:57, Borislav Petkov a écrit :
>
> > On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu
> > wrote:
> > > My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after
> > > upgrading to 6.1.20 and
Le 02/04/2023 à 12:57, Borislav Petkov a écrit :
On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu
wrote:
My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after
upgrading to 6.1.20 and resulted in a kernel panic:
Does this fix it:
On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu
wrote:
>My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after
>upgrading to 6.1.20 and resulted in a kernel panic:
Does this fix it:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=x86/urgent
Thx.
--
Sent
Le 05/01/2023 à 05:10, Kishon Vijay Abraham I a écrit :
Section 5.2.12.12 Processor Local x2APIC Structure in the ACPI v6.5
spec mandates that both "enabled" and "online capable" Local APIC Flags
should be used to determine if the processor is usable or not.
However, Linux doesn't use the
5 matches
Mail list logo
