Bug#1034234: libpam-modules-bin: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in /usr/lib/systemd/system

2024-01-21 Thread Michael Biebl
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 11:45:43 + Luca Boccassi wrote: On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:37:27 +0200 bi...@debian.org wrote: > This is not supported by the version of dh_installsystemd/debhelper currently > in unstable and bookworm (See: #1031695). That means that currently your > service might not be

Bug#1034234: libpam-modules-bin: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in /usr/lib/systemd/system

2024-01-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:37:27 +0200 bi...@debian.org wrote: > Package: libpam-modules-bin > Version: 1.5.2-6   > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bookworm > User: debhel...@packages.debian.org > Usertags: systemd-files-in-usr-bookworm > > Dear Maintainer, > > It seems that your package

Bug#1034234: libpam-modules-bin: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in /usr/lib/systemd/system

2023-04-25 Thread Sam Hartman
control: severity -1 normal > "Cyril" == Cyril Brulebois writes: Cyril> serious & wontfix make for a strange combination… Yeah, my bad for dropping the ball. My intent with wontfix was to create a pause and better understand the issue. As I understand it, * On first install,

Bug#1034234: libpam-modules-bin: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in /usr/lib/systemd/system

2023-04-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 patch Sam Hartman (2023-04-11): > control: tags -1 wontfix serious & wontfix make for a strange combination… > > "bigon" == bigon writes: > > bigon> It seems that your package libpam-modules-bin is shipping > bigon> files (.service, .socket or .timer) in >

Bug#1034234: libpam-modules-bin: dh_installsystemd doesn't handle files in /usr/lib/systemd/system

2023-04-11 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 09:37:27AM +0200, bi...@debian.org wrote: > Package: libpam-modules-bin > Version: 1.5.2-6 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bookworm > User: debhel...@packages.debian.org > Usertags: systemd-files-in-usr-bookworm > > Dear Maintainer, > > It seems that your package