On 26/05/2023 05.01, Steven Robbins wrote:
fonts-urw-base35 does not provide the old "numeric" font names
gsfonts-x11 had.
Thanks for this. Do you happen to know of a package that does ship those
fonts, even if a different name?
That should be fonts-urw-base35, at least that's what the
On Tue, 23 May 2023 10:21:29 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> fonts-urw-base35 does not provide the old "numeric" font names
> gsfonts-x11 had.
Thanks for this. Do you happen to know of a package that does ship those
fonts, even if a different name?
> (gsfonts-x11 is now an empty transitional
Package: libinventor1
Version: 2.1.5-10+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
broken symlinks:
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m36.0s ERROR: FAIL: Broken
3 matches
Mail list logo