Bug#1036817: missing simplified version for 'sao' (187.8)

2023-05-26 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Hi Toni, I leave it to others to comment on the traditional/simplified aspect, but as regards the rendering I have a theory. On 2023-05-27 01:54, Toni Mueller wrote: I am trying to write the character 'sao' (see attached image), but only get the traditional version of it, which is then

Bug#1036817: missing simplified version for 'sao' (187.8)

2023-05-26 Thread Toni Mueller
Package: fcitx-table Version: 1:4.2.9.8-3 Severity: minor Tags: upstream Hi, I am trying to write the character 'sao' (see attached image), but only get the traditional version of it, which is then mistaken as a Japanese character. It would be nice if you could add this character. Thanks,