Hi Richard,
I'm sorry for my tardy response. I just returned from holiday.
On 2023-07-23 05:11, Richard Laager wrote:
> Some questions from upstream, with my commentary added...
>
>> How busy is this sustem? Is it just a simple client or also a server? If
>> server, how busy?
This is a server
Is this reproducible for you? If you have experience with building from
source, upstream has proposed the following patch. Otherwise, I could
build a test package for you.
diff --git a/ntpd/nts_cookie.c b/ntpd/nts_cookie.c
index 166d0230f..a73955fb7 100644
--- a/ntpd/nts_cookie.c
+++
Some questions from upstream, with my commentary added...
How busy is this sustem? Is it just a simple client or also a server? If
server, how busy?
From the stack trace, the server side is trying to decode a NTS cookie. Is this
box setup as a NTS server? That needs a certificate and key so
Hi,
Here's a backtrace from the latest ntpsec coredump.
root@karita:/var/lib/systemd/coredump# export
DEBUGINFOD_URLS="https://debuginfod.debian.net;
root@karita:/var/lib/systemd/coredump# coredumpctl debug
PID: 61726 (ntpd)
UID: 110 (ntpsec)
On 2023-06-28 20:14, forest.ow...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2023-06-28 02:39, Richard Laager wrote:
The original submitter replied off the tracker (probably by accident). I'll
summarize here.
The ntp.conf he included is the stock ntp.conf.
He indicated he will try to get a backtrace.
I'm trying
On 2023-06-28 02:39, Richard Laager wrote:
> The original submitter replied off the tracker (probably by accident). I'll
> summarize here.
>
> The ntp.conf he included is the stock ntp.conf.
>
> He indicated he will try to get a backtrace.
I'm trying to setup ntpsec to get a backtrace. I
The original submitter replied off the tracker (probably by accident).
I'll summarize here.
The ntp.conf he included is the stock ntp.conf.
He indicated he will try to get a backtrace.
--
Richard
I'm not sure if you saw this, as he didn't send it directly to you, but
Matt Selsky asked:
> Can you please share your ntp.conf or if there's a particular server
> that seems to cause this segfault so that we can try to reproduce it?
Also, can you get a stack trace? There are some instructions
Package: ntpsec
Version: 1.2.2+dfsg1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: forest.ow...@riseup.net
Dear Maintainer,
I updated the Debian release from bullseye to bookworm. With that update
the ntp package (ntpd 4.2.8p15) was replaced by ntpsec. The ntpsec
9 matches
Mail list logo
