Package: toot Version: 0.27.0-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.t...@sideload.33mail.com
Polls are void in CLI output. The body is there, but the ballot is simply omitted. And it’s omitted in a such a way that you don’t even know there is a poll. So you end up seeing /part/ of a status that ends up being confusing & useless. I’m sure it’s not an oversight at this point. Perhaps there is some complexity involved. If so, I suggest doing a quick placeholder of some kind so users at least know that a poll is missing. E.g. print in red letters somewhere: “[poll output not implemented in this version]”. Users would at least then know to get a dump of the raw post whenever this feature gets added: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038651 or to view it in the tui. In the long term, it’s worth noting that *no client* does polls well. You only ever see the votes that your server has received. In principle, these are subset and can be misleading. So ideally the votes should be counted at the server that hosted the poll, not the local server (if possible). -- System Information: Debian Release: 11.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (990, 'stable-updates'), (990, 'stable-security'), (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-19-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages toot depends on: ii python3 3.9.2-3 ii python3-bs4 4.9.3-1 ii python3-requests 2.25.1+dfsg-2 ii python3-urwid 2.1.2-1 ii python3-wcwidth 0.1.9+dfsg1-2 toot recommends no packages. toot suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
