Hi,
On 04-09-2023 00:21, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
I've just added an ignore hint for texlive-extra, as the
r-bioc-biocstyle issue is clearly less of a problem than this one (and
bug reports are filed).
Thanks for your response! When will the ignore hint be effective?
Immediately, but I had to
On 04.09.2023 00:21, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
On 03.09.2023 07:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hello Paul,
I've just added an ignore hint for texlive-extra, as the
r-bioc-biocstyle issue is clearly less of a problem than this one
(and bug reports are filed).
Thanks for your
On 03.09.2023 07:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hello Paul,
I've just added an ignore hint for texlive-extra, as the
r-bioc-biocstyle issue is clearly less of a problem than this one (and
bug reports are filed).
Thanks for your response! When will the ignore hint be effective?
Hilmar
--
sigfault
Control: reassign -1 texlive-binaries
On 20.07.2023 00:06, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
Hi,
Upgrading tex-common seems to fail when attempting to rebuild formats
(log attached).
That issue is in texlive-binaries and has been solved there.
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP
Le samedi 02 septembre 2023 à 23:47 +0200, Preuße, Hilmar a écrit :
> Control: block -1 by 1050807
>
> On 02.09.2023 07:57, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
> > appropriate ***
> >
> > * What led up to the situation?
>
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
On Sat, 2 Sep 2023 23:47:19 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?UHJldcOfZSwgSGlsbWFy?=
wrote:
Sorry, for the trouble, I should have added a "Breaks" statement to
texlive-binaries. Maybe it makes sense to do that now?
Yes and no. Adding the Breaks will prevent migration of
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 10:06:54PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> That file is buggy:
>
> \HINTstream0 %main text
> \HINTstream\footins
>\HINTsetstream\topins = %topinsert
> -prefered 0
> +preferred 0
>{%
> \HINTafter = {}
>}
>
Control: block -1 by 1050807
On 02.09.2023 07:57, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Hi,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
routine upgrade of testing's tex-common
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was
On Sat, 02 Sep 2023, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> Indeed.
That file is buggy:
\HINTstream0 %main text
\HINTstream\footins
\HINTsetstream\topins = %topinsert
-prefered 0
+preferred 0
{%
\HINTafter = {}
}
\HINTsetstream\footins =%footnotes
-prefered 255
+
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 08:35:31PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2023, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> > (hiplainpage.tex
> > ! Missing { inserted.
>
> Very strange. Works on my upstream TeX Live.
>
> Can you show me
> hiplainpage.tex
> ?
> You can find it with
> kpsewhich
On Sat, 02 Sep 2023, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> (hiplainpage.tex
> ! Missing { inserted.
Very strange. Works on my upstream TeX Live.
Can you show me
hiplainpage.tex
?
You can find it with
kpsewhich hiplainpage.tex
it should be in
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 08:08:01PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> Sorry, copied the wrong line. That worked,
> The format that failed to build was hitex AFAIR, that would be
> /var/lib/texmf/web2c/hitex/hitex.log
No problem
Bye,
Joerg
This is HiTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-2.0
On Sat, 02 Sep 2023, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> fmtutil [INFO]: log file copied to: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex/mltex.log
That file would be useful.
Best
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info
Mercari Inc. + IFMGA Guide + TU Wien +
Hi
On Sat, 02 Sep 2023, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> > > fmtutil [INFO]: log file copied to: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex/mltex.log
> >
> > That file would be useful.
>
> There you are.
Sorry, copied the wrong line. That worked,
The format that failed to build was hitex AFAIR, that would be
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 07:46:29PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2023, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> > fmtutil [INFO]: log file copied to: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex/mltex.log
>
> That file would be useful.
There you are.
Bye,
Joerg
This is pdfTeX, Version
Addendum: This seems to be related to the arrival of texlive-bin
2023.20230311.66589-3 in testing.
Bye,
Joerg
Hello,
following testing I noticed the effect doing the routine tex updates.
The file/tmp/fmtutil.mihI6SqL ends with
fmtutil [INFO]: log file copied to: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex/mltex.log
fmtutil [INFO]: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex/mltex.fmt installed.
fmtutil [ERROR]: no (or empty)
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:28:44 +0200 Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
[...]
> This issue
> should have been solved in texlive-base_2023.20230311.66589-3, which as
> finally uploaded to unstable.
Hello,
I am another user who experienced the issue.
I can confirm that upgrading to
Package: tex-common
Version: 6.18
Followup-For: Bug #1041508
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
routine upgrade of testing's tex-common
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective
Package: tex-common
Version: 6.18
Followup-For: Bug #1041508
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
routine upgrade of testing's tex-common
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective
On 31.08.2023 15:17, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 12:46:45AM +0200, =?UTF-8?Q?Preu=C3=9Fe wrote:
On 20.07.2023 00:06, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
Hello Adrian,
Upgrading tex-common seems to fail when attempting to rebuild formats (log
attached).
This reminds me to an issue I've
On 20.07.2023 00:06, ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ wrote:
Hello ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್,
Upgrading tex-common seems to fail when attempting to rebuild formats (log
attached).
This reminds me to an issue I've seen due to an incomplete upgrade to TL
2023. The issue should be solved by yesterdays upload of TL 2023 to
22 matches
Mail list logo
