Bug#1041982: Speeding up Symfony 6 transition? [Was: Upcoming transitions (Symfony, PHPUnit, etc.)]
Hi, Le Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:19:06AM +0100, David Prévot a écrit : > […] I wish to > proceed with the transition during the next MiniDebCampHamburg happening > early March (in less than two weeks). > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/de/2024/MiniDebCampHamburg And that’s done (in unstable)! It needed some last minute tweaking for debci mostly, but the [excuses] page looks good now. I expect the only blockers will be removal (or fix) of php-laravel-lumen-framework and php-laravel-framework (autoremoval expected March 14 and April 7 respectively, sooner if the release team uses some magic). excuses: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=symfony Thanks to everyone involved! I intend to follow up with some more major version bump on packages that were waiting for Symfony (php-psr-link, php-psr-log, php-email-validator and some packages from the Doctrine stack…). The next big transition in PHP libraries before Trixie may be PHPUnit 11 if we manage to pull it off. Cheers, taffit signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1041982: Speeding up Symfony 6 transition? [Was: Upcoming transitions (Symfony, PHPUnit, etc.)]
control: severity 1039731 serious control: severity 1051989 serious control: severity 1051985 serious control: severity 1039733 serious Le Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:19:06AM +0100, David Prévot a écrit : > Le Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 07:04:12PM +0100, David Prévot a écrit : > […] > > I’m in favour of raising the severity of bugs blocking this transition > > to RC level ASAP: Symfony 6 has been in experimental for a while now > > I intend to do so early next week And here we are. Cheers, taffit signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1041982: Speeding up Symfony 6 transition? [Was: Upcoming transitions (Symfony, PHPUnit, etc.)]
Hi, Le Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 07:04:12PM +0100, David Prévot a écrit : […] > I’m in favour of raising the severity of bugs blocking this transition > to RC level ASAP: Symfony 6 has been in experimental for a while now I intend to do so early next week: symfony 6 was introduced in experimental during the latest Debian Reunion Hamburg, and I wish to proceed with the transition during the next MiniDebCampHamburg happening early March (in less than two weeks). https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/de/2024/MiniDebCampHamburg This transition should not interfere with any other one, and should not even need any help from the Release Team (no binNMU since they’re all arch:all packages), yet they were helpful last time to speed it up by removing blocking packages from testing because we didn’t raise the blocking bug severity early enough. Regards, taffit signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1041982: Speeding up Symfony 6 transition? [Was: Upcoming transitions (Symfony, PHPUnit, etc.)]
control: block -1 with 1051989 control: severity 1051989 important control: severity 1051988 important Le Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 07:57:03PM +0530, David Prévot a écrit : > […] roughly, the > following end user packages (families) are not yet ready. > > civicrm (#1051988) > kanboard (#1051989 and php-pimple) > Laravel (#1051985 and #1039731, and php-faker) > shaarli (#1039733 and php-slim, php-pimple) > > civicrm is not in stable […] Robin already explicitly > agreed that can be Laravel can be removed again from testing until a new > upstream version is packaged. > > I don’t know if there are strong opinions about kanboard and shaarli, > Joseph and James CCed. kanboard has been removed from testing in the mean time (due to #1051989). > […] it may already be time to raise the severity of the > blocking bugs. I’m in favour of raising the severity of bugs blocking this transition to RC level ASAP: Symfony 6 has been in experimental for a while now, and it’s the targeted version for Trixie anyway (6.4 is likely to be the latest LTS version available before the Freeze, while 5.4 will be EOL soon after Trixie gets released). https://symfony.com/releases#symfony-releases-calendar > Athos may try to rebuild packages also depending on recent version of > php-symfony-contracts, php-psr-cache, php-psr-container and php-psr-log > in order to figure out if more package are affected by this transition. That would still be very much welcome if time permits, but IMHO not a blocker (we used to handle such transition without involving the release team nor as much build testing than already done for this transition. Thanks to all people involved, the current state makes us in a better position to move forward). Regards, taffit signature.asc Description: PGP signature