Bug#1042111: chromium: Web Environment Integrity

2023-10-23 Thread networkException
Thanks for working on this! I noticed that this patch is not listed in the copyright file, it would be great if someone could include the header from the ungoogled-chromium repository.

Bug#1042111: chromium: Web Environment Integrity

2023-07-31 Thread Andres Salomon
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:12:13 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote: > As Matt mentioned, this is something that we need to decide if we want > disabled at build time (deleting base_feature_status from > third_party/blink/renderer/platform/runtime_enabled_features.json5 , > which would turn it back into a

Bug#1042111: chromium: Web Environment Integrity

2023-07-27 Thread Timothy Pearson
In my opinion, as a maintainer and user of Chromium (as distinct from Chrome), we absolutely need to ship this with the code removed / disabled. This is a deliberate attempt to lock out the open Web, to force the use of a Google-approved (and Google-locked) software, firmware, and hardware

Bug#1042111: chromium: Web Environment Integrity

2023-07-26 Thread Andres Salomon
As Matt mentioned, this is something that we need to decide if we want disabled at build time (deleting base_feature_status from third_party/blink/renderer/platform/runtime_enabled_features.json5 , which would turn it back into a blink field-trial option that's disabled by default), disabled

Bug#1042111: chromium: Web Environment Integrity

2023-07-26 Thread Matt Taggart
Package: chromium Version: 115.0.5790.102-2 Engineers working for Google have proposed a standard named Web Environment Integrity details available at https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/blob/main/explainer.md There have been hundreds of articles, social media