Bug#1042896: transition: armadillo
Dear Graham, On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:35:46AM +, Graham Inggs wrote: > > Please go ahead. I just did a source-only upload. Will keep an eye on the buildds. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah
Bug#1042896: transition: armadillo
Control: block -1 by 1028633 On 8/30/23 09:13, Kumar Appaiah wrote: I could not build mlpack since the build failed, but I am sure it's not due to pip. Here is the extract from the failed build log: -- After much of the build mkdir: cannot create directory '/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/': Permission denied /usr/bin/python3: No module named pip CMake Error at /build/mlpack-4.1.0/src/mlpack/bindings/python/PythonInstall.cmake:23 (message): Error installing Python bindings! Call Stack (most recent call first): src/mlpack/bindings/python/cmake_install.cmake:66 (include) src/mlpack/bindings/cmake_install.cmake:50 (include) src/mlpack/cmake_install.cmake:68 (include) cmake_install.cmake:55 (include) That's a known issue: #1028633 Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Bug#1042896: transition: armadillo
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Kumar On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 07:22, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Thanks for the response. I have build the following packages > successfully using the new Armadillo: > > gdal > gnss-sdr > phyx > seer > tvc Great! > I could not build mlpack since the build failed, but I am sure it's > not due to pip. Here is the extract from the failed build log: That's fine, mlpack has not been in testing for some time already. Please go ahead. Regards Graham
Bug#1042896: transition: armadillo
Dear Graham, On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 10:53:47AM +, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Kumar > > On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 13:48, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > I have uploaded the new Armadillo to experimental. I would like your > > permission to upload it to unstable. binNMUs should be sufficient for > > the reverse dependencies. > > Have you checked that all the reverse-build-dependencies build with > the new version of armadillo? Thanks for the response. I have build the following packages successfully using the new Armadillo: gdal gnss-sdr phyx seer tvc I could not build mlpack since the build failed, but I am sure it's not due to pip. Here is the extract from the failed build log: -- After much of the build mkdir: cannot create directory '/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/': Permission denied /usr/bin/python3: No module named pip CMake Error at /build/mlpack-4.1.0/src/mlpack/bindings/python/PythonInstall.cmake:23 (message): Error installing Python bindings! Call Stack (most recent call first): src/mlpack/bindings/python/cmake_install.cmake:66 (include) src/mlpack/bindings/cmake_install.cmake:50 (include) src/mlpack/cmake_install.cmake:68 (include) cmake_install.cmake:55 (include) Please let me know if any other information is needed. Thanks. Kumar
Bug#1042896: transition: armadillo
Hi Kumar On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 13:48, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > I have uploaded the new Armadillo to experimental. I would like your > permission to upload it to unstable. binNMUs should be sufficient for > the reverse dependencies. Have you checked that all the reverse-build-dependencies build with the new version of armadillo? Regards Graham
Bug#1042896: transition: armadillo
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: armadi...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:armadillo Dear Release Team, I have uploaded the new Armadillo to experimental. I would like your permission to upload it to unstable. binNMUs should be sufficient for the reverse dependencies. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kumar Ben file: title = "armadillo"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libarmadillo11" | .depends ~ "libarmadillo12"; is_good = .depends ~ "libarmadillo12"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libarmadillo11";
