Bug#1043217: netmaze: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

[John Goerzen]

On Thu, Aug 17 2023, Bastian Germann wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Am 17.08.23 um 02:54 schrieb John Goerzen:
>> Is there a way to remove from delayed?
>
> Yes. I will do so. If you don't mind, I will add an explicit 1.0 format.

Sure, that is fine.

Incidentally, I got this:

DELAYED/2-day/netmaze_0.81+jpg0.82-16.2_source.changes is already present on 
target host:
10-day/netmaze_0.81+jpg0.82-16.2_source.buildinfo
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job netmaze_0.81+jpg0.82-16.2_source.changes removed.

Maybe the upload for the explicit 1.0 format tried to go in to 2-day but
got rejected?  Not quite sure.

- John

Bug#1043217: netmaze: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

[Bastian Germann]

Okay, here is the new debdiff.diff -u netmaze-0.81+jpg0.82/debian/changelog 
netmaze-0.81+jpg0.82/debian/changelog
--- netmaze-0.81+jpg0.82/debian/changelog
+++ netmaze-0.81+jpg0.82/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+netmaze (0.81+jpg0.82-16.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Make source format 1.0 explicit.  See #1043217.
+
+ -- Bastian Germann   Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:27:05 +0200
+
 netmaze (0.81+jpg0.82-16.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- netmaze-0.81+jpg0.82.orig/debian/source/format
+++ netmaze-0.81+jpg0.82/debian/source/format
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1.0

Bug#1043217: netmaze: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

[Bastian Germann]

Hi John,

Am 17.08.23 um 02:54 schrieb John Goerzen:

Is there a way to remove from delayed?


Yes. I will do so. If you don't mind, I will add an explicit 1.0 format.

Cheers,
Bastian

Bug#1043217: netmaze: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

[John Goerzen]

Hello Bastian,

Thank you for the contribution and your work to improve Debian.  I
appreciate NMUs!

However, I would prefer not to do this to Netmaze.  I have people that
send me patches on Github from time to time, and this makes it
significantly more difficult for non-Debian contributors to participate.

Personal opinion: Source format is duplicitive of features already in
git for packages that are maintained in git, and makes collaboration
with others more challenging, especially in a case like this.

Is there a way to remove from delayed?

- John

On Thu, Aug 17 2023, Bastian Germann wrote:

> I am uploading a NMU to DELAYED/10 to fix this. The debdiff is attached.
>
> [2. text/plain; netmaze_0.81+jpg0.82-16.2.debdiff]...

Bug#1043217: netmaze: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

[Bastian Germann]

Source: netmaze
Version: 0.81+jpg0.82-16.1
Severity: wishlist

This package is among the few that still use source format 1.0.
Please upgrade it to source format 3.0:
https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0