Hi,
Yes, the main reason for keeping the old debhelper for jtreg is that
its version is kept in sync with openjdk (due to the build
requirements of openjdk). The updated versions of jtreg normally work
with older dependencies, so we do not need to upgrade them often. The
security updates (of
Hi Vladimir,
Definitely no need for you to apologize. I hope my tone didn't come
across as aggressive. My goal is merely to establish what we (meaning,
the Java Team) should take into consideration for backports. Based on
the exchange so far, it appears
that we want to keep jtreg6 (and all
Hi,
I apologise for my earlier comment being too vague and in the wrong
tone and mentioning a completely wrong (or misleading) thing. We do
openjdk security updates in -security pocket in Ubuntu and according
to security team FAQ[1] the updates are built with -release and
-security pockets. The
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 07:19:15AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 07:04:05PM +1200, Vladimir Petko wrote:
> > The debhelper-compat was intentionally set to >=11 in order to
> > support backports.
>
> Thank you for the reminder. I can easily revert the change.
4 matches
Mail list logo
