* Rafael Laboissière [2023-11-15 18:37]:
* Rafael Laboissière [2023-11-15 18:06]:
I have investigated the issue a little bit deeper. Please, find here
attached a new tarball with a simplified version of the x09f.f90
file, that still triggers the bug. Running the resulting executable
with
* Rafael Laboissière [2023-11-15 18:06]:
I have investigated the issue a little bit deeper. Please, find here
attached a new tarball with a simplified version of the x09f.f90 file,
that still triggers the bug. Running the resulting executable with
gbd, yields the following:
Oops, with the
* Emanuele Rocca [2023-11-14 12:01]:
On 2023-11-13 05:13, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
The attached file bug-1055750.tgz contains a minimal code that
triggers the bug on an armhf system
Thanks! For the record I can reproduce the issue in a armhf chroot, but
*not* on armel and arm64. The only
Hi Rafael,
On 2023-11-13 05:13, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> The attached file bug-1055750.tgz contains a minimal code that
> triggers the bug on an armhf system
Thanks! For the record I can reproduce the issue in a armhf chroot, but
*not* on armel and arm64. The only thing to change in the
The attached file bug-1055750.tgz contains a minimal code that
triggers the bug on an armhf system :
$ ./run
* Compile without -fstack-clash-protection & run
/usr/bin/ld: warning: /tmp/cc9l2GJa.o: requires executable stack (because the .note.GNU-stack section is executable)
Package: gfortran
Version: 13.2.0-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The motivation for the present bug report comes from Bug#1055228. Since
version 1.22.1 of dpkg-dev was released (on October 30), the plplot
package FTBFS due to a failing compilation of one of Fortran examples,
which is
6 matches
Mail list logo
