Bug#1055765: chromium: Error: Can't open display (armhf) while other platforms (amd64, arm64, i386) are OK

2023-11-14 Thread Andres Salomon
Ah, so the "Can't open display" error is coming from xmessage, *not* chromium. I should fix that. As far as qemu, I'd suggest filing a bug on that binfmt project to not use passthrough mode; I'm not sure if it should be something decided/set at build time, or if there's a way to get

Bug#1055765: chromium: Error: Can't open display (armhf) while other platforms (amd64, arm64, i386) are OK

2023-11-14 Thread Julien Neuhart
Please find below the output of ‘bash -x /usr/bin/chromium —version’ (latest chromium version on armhf): bash -x /usr/bin/chromium --version: + APPNAME=chromium + GDB=/usr/bin/gdb + LIBDIR=/usr/lib/chromium + BUILD_DIST=12.2 + nosse3='The hardware on this system lacks support for the sse3

Bug#1055765: chromium: Error: Can't open display (armhf) while other platforms (amd64, arm64, i386) are OK

2023-11-13 Thread Andres Salomon
Control: found -1 117.0.5938.149-1~deb12u1 Thanks. More questions below: On Mon, Nov 13 2023 at 08:28:41 PM +01:00:00, Julien Neuhart wrote: I’ve been able to reproduce the issue (e.g., Can’t open display) with versions 117.0.5938.149-1~deb12u1 and 118.0.5993.70-1~deb12u1. uname -a:

Bug#1055765: chromium: Error: Can't open display (armhf) while other platforms (amd64, arm64, i386) are OK

2023-11-13 Thread Julien Neuhart
I’ve been able to reproduce the issue (e.g., Can’t open display) with versions 117.0.5938.149-1~deb12u1 and 118.0.5993.70-1~deb12u1. uname -a: Linux buildkitsandbox 6.2.0-1015-azure #15~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 6 13:20:44 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux cat /proc/cpuinfo: processor : 0

Bug#1055765: chromium: Error: Can't open display (armhf) while other platforms (amd64, arm64, i386) are OK

2023-11-12 Thread Andres Salomon
Probably the easiest way is to manually download the chromium and chromium-common deb packages, and then 'sudo apt install /path/to/chromium_117.x.y.z-1~deb12u1_armhf.deb /path/to/chromium-common_117.x.y.z-1~deb12u1_armhf.deb'. If you go to

Bug#1055765: chromium: Error: Can't open display (armhf) while other platforms (amd64, arm64, i386) are OK

2023-11-11 Thread Julien Neuhart
Could you guide me on how ton install those versions? As far as I know, they are not available in bookworm directly. Thanks! > Le 11 nov. 2023 à 21:51, Andres Salomon a écrit : > > Okay, so not distribution-specific. Between 116 and 119 there were a > considerable number of changes in the

Bug#1055765: chromium: Error: Can't open display (armhf) while other platforms (amd64, arm64, i386) are OK

2023-11-11 Thread Andres Salomon
Okay, so not distribution-specific. Between 116 and 119 there were a considerable number of changes in the debian packaging, including switching from clang-14 to clang-16 for build (done in 118.0.5993.117-1~deb12u1) and enabling NEON for armhf (done in 117.0.5938.132-1~deb12u1). My immediate

Bug#1055765: chromium: Error: Can't open display (armhf) while other platforms (amd64, arm64, i386) are OK

2023-11-11 Thread Julien Neuhart
Hello Andres, Thanks for the quick follow up. So I’ve tested with Chromium 116.0.5845.180-1~deb12u1 and it works as expected on Debian 12. Note that I also had to explicitly install the chromium-common package: DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install -y -qq --no-install-recommends

Bug#1055765: chromium: Error: Can't open display (armhf) while other platforms (amd64, arm64, i386) are OK

2023-11-10 Thread Andres Salomon
Hi, Can you please try other versions if possible? 119.0.6045.123-1~deb12u1 is currently in bookworm-security. 116.0.5845.180-1~deb12u1 is still in bookworm. It would be helpful to know if this is a bookworm-specific regression, since it worked on bullseye's 116, or something broken in

Bug#1055765: chromium: Error: Can't open display (armhf) while other platforms (amd64, arm64, i386) are OK

2023-11-10 Thread Julien Neuhart
Package: chromium Version: 119.0.6045.105-1~deb12u1 Dear maintainers, While building with QEMU a Docker image based on Debian bookworm using the chromium package, I found out that the « armhf » variant seems broken, which is not the case for others platforms. Indeed, after having installed