Bug#1060922: Status of debian-ports

2024-02-24 Thread Christoph Biedl
Julien Cristau wrote...

> The snapshot infrastructure currently can't cope with -ports imports,
> as they take longer than the interval between pushes, for reasons.
> We'll turn it back on when we can.

Thanks for the update. If you think people can help you with that,
please let us know.

My current archive has sufficient capacity until the end of the year.

Christoph


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1060922: Status of debian-ports

2024-02-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 18:25:10 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:

> Looking at
> 
> https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/
> 
> it seems debian-ports was not updated for almost half a year now. If
> that was just an error, please fix it. If it was discontinued by
> intention, please place according notices - or better, re-consider your
> decision: For release architectures, there's at least archive.d.o to
> access some older versions of packages, although in a two-year interval
> only. For the ports, there's plain nothing.
> 
The snapshot infrastructure currently can't cope with -ports imports,
as they take longer than the interval between pushes, for reasons.
We'll turn it back on when we can.

Cheers,
Julien



Bug#1060922: Status of debian-ports

2024-02-03 Thread Erik Larsson
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 07:44:57 +0100 Christoph Biedl 
 wrote:

> Christoph Biedl wrote...
>
> > Looking at
> >
> > https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/
> >
> > it seems debian-ports was not updated for almost half a year now. If
> > that was just an error, please fix it. If it was discontinued by
> > intention, please place according notices - or better, re-consider your
> > decision: For release architectures, there's at least archive.d.o to
> > access some older versions of packages, although in a two-year interval
> > only. For the ports, there's plain nothing.
>
> Having snapshots of the debian ports is important to me. As there was no
> officical reaction of any kind, I've started running my own archive,
> using filesystem snapshots. However, I do not intend to make this a
> public service as I lack the ressources to do this in a sane way, also
> this would only be understood as a competition, life is to short for
> that.
>
> It you, future reader, need access to a particular file, drop me a line.
> As processing will have to be done by hand, answers might take a while.

I also have this problem, and I've also started to archive packages for 
ports architectures that I actively use. Having to resort to this is 
very unfortunate. The snapshot.debian.org service is extremely useful 
for the ports especially as many ports regularly break newer package 
versions due to intermittent FTBS issues that cause the 'all' packages 
to be out of sync with the arch-specific ones.
Having access to the recent history on snapshot.debian.org means that 
you can fetch the matching 'all' package version and fix the problem.


If it's an issue of the ports architectures taking up too much disk 
space on Debian's servers, then maybe limit the history of the ports 
archive, but please keep it up to date.
Though if I can afford the disk space on my home NAS then maybe the 
Debian project also could afford it and this is just a glitch. I'm 
hopeful. :)


- Erik



Bug#1060922: Status of debian-ports

2024-01-30 Thread Christoph Biedl
Christoph Biedl wrote...

> Looking at
>
> https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/
>
> it seems debian-ports was not updated for almost half a year now. If
> that was just an error, please fix it. If it was discontinued by
> intention, please place according notices - or better, re-consider your
> decision: For release architectures, there's at least archive.d.o to
> access some older versions of packages, although in a two-year interval
> only. For the ports, there's plain nothing.

Having snapshots of the debian ports is important to me. As there was no
officical reaction of any kind, I've started running my own archive,
using filesystem snapshots. However, I do not intend to make this a
public service as I lack the ressources to do this in a sane way, also
this would only be understood as a competition, life is to short for
that.

It you, future reader, need access to a particular file, drop me a line.
As processing will have to be done by hand, answers might take a while.

Christoph


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1060922: Status of debian-ports

2024-01-16 Thread Christoph Biedl
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de

Greetings,

Looking at

https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/

it seems debian-ports was not updated for almost half a year now. If
that was just an error, please fix it. If it was discontinued by
intention, please place according notices - or better, re-consider your
decision: For release architectures, there's at least archive.d.o to
access some older versions of packages, although in a two-year interval
only. For the ports, there's plain nothing.

Christoph



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature