On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 12:50:16AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> The time_t transition was only for 32 bits arch support, right? It needs
> nothing in 64 bits arch.
> If that's the case, then you can remove Ceph from your list. The
> Experimental package of Ceph, already lost
On 2/27/24 08:07, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Hi Steve,
I would not bother too much, actually I'm winding why ceph was not yet removed
from the 32bit architectures. It's just not supported by upstream and although
it builds, I would not trust it to work correctly.
Bernd
Hi Bernd,
Well, Ceph
On 1/31/24 10:00, Steve Langasek wrote:
Source: ceph
Version: 16.2.11+ds-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Dear maintainer,
As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
Hi Steve,
I would not bother too much, actually I'm winding why ceph was not yet removed
from the 32bit architectures. It's just not supported by upstream and although
it builds, I would not trust it to work correctly.
Bernd
31.01.2024 10:03:28 Steve Langasek :
> Source: ceph
> Version:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 09:00:26AM +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Since turning on 64-bit time_t is being handled centrally through a change
> to the default dpkg-buildflags (https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), it is
> important that libraries affected by this ABI change all be uploaded close
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
