Hi Rafael and Nicolas
On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 19:58, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> I will soon upload version 5.15.0+dfsg2-11, with the fix proposed by
> Nicolas in Bug#1070746.
Thanks for the quick turnaround!
gnat 13 has migrated.
Regards
Graham
* Graham Inggs [2024-05-08 10:25]:
It looks like the last blocker for this transition is plplot
5.15.0+dfsg2-10 failing its own autopkgtests [1].
I will soon upload version 5.15.0+dfsg2-11, with the fix proposed by
Nicolas in Bug#1070746.
Best,
Rafael
Hi Nicolas and Rafael
It looks like the last blocker for this transition is plplot
5.15.0+dfsg2-10 failing its own autopkgtests [1].
Regards
Graham
[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/plplot/
Hi Nicholas
On Sat, 4 May 2024 at 12:21, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> For some reason, some rebuilds succeeded without a +b1 version.
I think if the original uploads FTBFS then they would not have gained
a +b1 version.
> Their reverse dependencies is dep-waiting on the +b1 version.
> Please
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1065309
Hello.
For some reason, some rebuilds succeeded without a +b1 version.
Their reverse dependencies is dep-waiting on the +b1 version.
Please cancel three dep-wait restrictions.
gb libgnatcoll-db_23.0.0-6 . armel powerpc . -o
gb
Hi Nicholas
I think the builds are on track, except for:
libtemplates-parser FTBFS on arch:all [1]
gprbuild FTBFS on arch:any [2]
libgnatcoll, libgnatcoll-bindings and libgnatcoll-db are blocked by
the builds of gprbuild
Regards
Graham
[1]
Hi Nicholas
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 12:33, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> The time_t64 transition has triggered #1067453 in the Ada compiler,
> which is now fixed by gcc-13/13.2.0-24.
>
> The patch modifies the sources of the Ada standard library, so most
> Ada packages need a rebuild in order to
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1065309
Hello.
The time_t64 transition has triggered #1067453 in the Ada compiler,
which is now fixed by gcc-13/13.2.0-24.
The patch modifies the sources of the Ada standard library, so most
Ada packages need a rebuild in order to update their
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Matthias, Nicolas
On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 at 12:39, Matthias Klose wrote:
> when preparing GCC packages for time_t64, I noticed that we'll have an
> ABI change for libgnat as well. Instead of doing a gnat 12 -> 12+t64
> transition, let's do a gnat 12 -> 13+t64
Hello.
Version 2 seems OK.
Thanks.
Hi Nicolas, Matthias
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 at 16:18, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> Ben file:
>
> title = "gnat-13";
> is_affected = .depends ~
> "libgnat-8/libgnat-9/libgnat-10/libgnat-11/libgnat-12" | .depends ~
> "libgnat-13";
> is_good = .depends ~ "libgnat-13";
> is_bad = .depends ~
Hello.
A bug affects the Ada tests during the build of the gcc-12 source
package.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066052
Such error messages happen on each (uncoordinated) change in the sources
of an Ada library. Some sources for the standard library built by GCC
are
Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hello.
In addition to the information in https://bugs.debian.org/1065309,
here is the usual summary preparing a gnat transition.
--
This bug requests a green light for a transition of Ada packages from
gnat-12 to gnat-13 in
Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: Nicolas Boulenguez
when preparing GCC packages for time_t64, I noticed that we'll have an
ABI change for libgnat as well. Instead of doing a gnat 12 -> 12+t64
transition, let's do a gnat 12 -> 13+t64 transition instead. According
to Nicolas,
14 matches
Mail list logo
