On 2024-05-14 Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> well you could post the complete output of
>> gnutls-cli --port 636 fd12:3456:7890:abcd::3
>> perhaps even with -d10? I would reassign to openldap then if there are
>> no obvious
affects 1070033 nslcd
quit
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2024-04-30 Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 05:55:15AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > On 2024-04-29 Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> [...]
> > > > From `nslcd` on clients I was
On 2024-04-30 Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 05:55:15AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > On 2024-04-29 Elliott Mitchell wrote:
[...]
> > > From `nslcd` on clients I was getting the message:
> > > nslcd[12345]: [1a2b3c] failed to bind to LDAP
> > > server
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 05:55:15AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2024-04-29 Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > Package: libgnutls30
> > Version: 3.7.9-2+deb12u2
> > Severity: important
>
> > Long story to finding this one. Trying to get LDAP setup on this
> > network. As a recent deployment it
On 2024-04-29 Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> Package: libgnutls30
> Version: 3.7.9-2+deb12u2
> Severity: important
> Long story to finding this one. Trying to get LDAP setup on this
> network. As a recent deployment it seemed appropriate to use IPv6.
> From `nslcd` on clients I was getting the
Package: libgnutls30
Version: 3.7.9-2+deb12u2
Severity: important
Long story to finding this one. Trying to get LDAP setup on this
network. As a recent deployment it seemed appropriate to use IPv6.
>From `nslcd` on clients I was getting the message:
nslcd[12345]: [1a2b3c] failed to bind to
6 matches
Mail list logo
