On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 01:25:08AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
Hi,
I was checking some old RFP's and I find this one. Is a little program
that distribute the job of cracking passwords using John the Ripper.
I think this is not totally legal to be packaged officially for Debian.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Donnellan escribió:
Password cracking in itself has always been legal AFAIK.
Using password crackers to crack other peoples systems without
permission (ie. illegally obtaining access) is definitely illegal.
There are legitimate uses for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I was checking some old RFP's and I find this one. Is a little program
that distribute the job of cracking passwords using John the Ripper.
I think this is not totally legal to be packaged officially for Debian.
Jose Luis,
P.S. Please CC me
Password cracking in itself has always been legal AFAIK.
Using password crackers to crack other peoples systems without
permission (ie. illegally obtaining access) is definitely illegal.
There are legitimate uses for tools like djohn, eg. for security
testing, for data recovery, etc.
On
On 1/4/07, Masayuki Hatta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Password cracking in itself has always been legal AFAIK.
Using password crackers to crack other peoples systems without
permission (ie. illegally obtaining access) is
Hi,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Password cracking in itself has always been legal AFAIK.
Using password crackers to crack other peoples systems without
permission (ie. illegally obtaining access) is definitely illegal.
There are legitimate uses for
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 06:04:21PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
AFAIK, in many jurisdictions, in regards to copyright circumvention it
is often determined on the basis of 'is there any commercially viable
legal use?' rather than 'is there any legal use?'. Did anyone
7 matches
Mail list logo
