Bug#224129: [rfk-dev] Re: Bug#224129: regrding this patch

2006-01-11 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:40:49PM -0700, Neale Pickett wrote: On Tuesday 10 January 2006 06:43 pm, Joey Hess wrote: - A lone, forgotten comma, sits here, sobbing., + A lone, forgotten comma sits here, sobbing., Surely, the extra comma, in the first line, is part of the fun, and should

Bug#224129: [rfk-dev] Re: Bug#224129: regrding this patch

2006-01-11 Thread Alexey Toptygin
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Neale Pickett wrote: On Tuesday 10 January 2006 06:43 pm, Joey Hess wrote: - A lone, forgotten comma, sits here, sobbing., + A lone, forgotten comma sits here, sobbing., Surely, the extra comma, in the first line, is part of the fun, and should not, be removed? Good

Bug#224129: [rfk-dev] Re: Bug#224129: regrding this patch

2006-01-11 Thread Leonard Richardson
Hmm, this is completely backwards; somehow the original NKI linting patch has been forgotten; all that made it here is commentary on the one part of it that no-one wanted applied. So, the real question is, should I be applying the rest of his patch? Note that it's adding an NKI. Also note I

Bug#224129: regrding this patch

2006-01-10 Thread Joey Hess
- A lone, forgotten comma, sits here, sobbing., + A lone, forgotten comma sits here, sobbing., Surely, the extra comma, in the first line, is part of the fun, and should not, be removed? -- see, shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#224129: regrding this patch

2006-01-10 Thread Neale Pickett
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 06:43 pm, Joey Hess wrote: - A lone, forgotten comma, sits here, sobbing., + A lone, forgotten comma sits here, sobbing., Surely, the extra comma, in the first line, is part of the fun, and should not, be removed? Good point. I'll take this up with the high