On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:54:14AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I did the new upstream, so I can tell you that it was only a couple of
lines of code changes, and they were tested well before being put into the
silo repo.
I don't think it needs extensive testing.
It seems that this version of
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:30:55AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
Can the silo I just uploaded go into testing atleast? It does fix some
bugs. In fact, it may fix some of the rc silo bugs, but I need testing
with it to make sure (didn't want to claim the bugs were fixed without
testing by others
I did the new upstream, so I can tell you that it was only a couple of
lines of code changes, and they were tested well before being put into the
silo repo.
I don't think it needs extensive testing.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:34:14AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at
severity 261824 important
severity 267428 important
thanks
Time's up, folks; if no fix has been found yet for these bootloader bugs,
they'll have to remain hardware-specific errata for sarge. They will no
longer be allowed to block the release, since silo still works on the
majority of sparc
Can the silo I just uploaded go into testing atleast? It does fix some
bugs. In fact, it may fix some of the rc silo bugs, but I need testing
with it to make sure (didn't want to claim the bugs were fixed without
testing by others first).
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:54:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek
5 matches
Mail list logo