On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:59:13PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Could the maintainers comment on this patch? As long as type-handling
> exists, it should have a man page, I think.
Yes, but you should understand that there is a lot to do in
GNU/kFreeBSD, and adding a manpage for a package tha
Could the maintainers comment on this patch? As long as type-handling
exists, it should have a man page, I think.
Btw., I noticed that if you apply this patch, you should also fix the
description to no longer refer to README.Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:20:47AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > I'm not the maintainer (anymore), but are you aware this utility is
> > deprecated in favour of dpkg aliases now? (see #291939)
>
> I was not aware of that, but judging from the discussion, it will still
Robert Millan wrote:
> I'm not the maintainer (anymore), but are you aware this utility is
> deprecated in favour of dpkg aliases now? (see #291939)
I was not aware of that, but judging from the discussion, it will still
be hundreds of years before type-handling disappears entirely.
--
To UNS
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:37:03AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Hi, I've transcribed the README.Debian into a man page. Attached is a
> patch that puts the man page into the source tree and removes the
> README.Debian.
Hi!
I'm not the maintainer (anymore), but are you aware this utility
tags 264118 + patch
stop
Hi, I've transcribed the README.Debian into a man page. Attached is a
patch that puts the man page into the source tree and removes the
README.Debian.
diff -Nru /tmp/pc5d7sIXZl/type-handling-0.2.16/debian/changelog /tmp/8Qw3N7vI4K/type-handling-0.2.17/debian/changelog
-
6 matches
Mail list logo
