Hi Alastair,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:59:39PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> Thanks, I saw that and am using gcc-3.3 at the moment. I will try to
> enforce 3.3 in
> the packaging (Depends: on gcc, then gcc-3.3 in the Makefiles, etc.)
>
> Regards
> Alastair
---end quoted text
Hi Alastair,
just poking through the package so far, and i noticed that etch is using
gcc4.1 and cross referencing the lustre-discuss list, i noticed that
even though 4.x is targetted but isnt working right, 3.3 / 3.4 seems to be
a better choice for compilers for lustre (at least for now) if one w
Hi Jimmy,
Thanks, I saw that and am using gcc-3.3 at the moment. I will try to
enforce 3.3 in
the packaging (Depends: on gcc, then gcc-3.3 in the Makefiles, etc.)
Regards
Alastair
Jimmy Tang wrote:
> Hi Alastair,
>
> just poking through the package so far, and i noticed that etch is using
> gcc
Jimmy Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess i didnt phrase my initial mail too well, but yes openib2 in the
> vanilla kernel + lustre it is something I would like to test. though we havent
> sucessfully gotten openib2 to work correctly on our compute systems so
> we havent looked at lustre +
Hi Goswin,
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 03:34:40PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >
> >> The 2.6.16 code I have works for light use: survives some tests such as
> >> bonnie, etc.
> >> but hangs in large workloads: I'm debugging this, but would prefer to
> >> target 2.6.17 for Etch.
> >> (even
Jimmy Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Alastair,
>
>> The 2.6.16 code I have works for light use: survives some tests such as
>> bonnie, etc.
>> but hangs in large workloads: I'm debugging this, but would prefer to
>> target 2.6.17 for Etch.
>> (even if we don't get in the Etch release, I
Hi Alastair,
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 01:24:44PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> >
> None at the moment; we've a small test cluster that had driver issues up
> to 2.6.17, and so i'm trying out 2.6.17.
ah okay, i think i know the problem you may be refering (to the e326
sata disks and control
Jimmy Tang wrote:
> Hi Alastair,
>
>
>> The 2.6.16 code I have works for light use: survives some tests such as
>> bonnie, etc.
>> but hangs in large workloads: I'm debugging this, but would prefer to
>> target 2.6.17 for Etch.
>> (even if we don't get in the Etch release, I'd like to suppor
Hi Alastair,
> The 2.6.16 code I have works for light use: survives some tests such as
> bonnie, etc.
> but hangs in large workloads: I'm debugging this, but would prefer to
> target 2.6.17 for Etch.
> (even if we don't get in the Etch release, I'd like to support the
> stable kernel.) Some p
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've initial packaging done for 1.5.91 (alias 1.6 beta 4). This is for
>> kernel 2.6.16; I'm
>> porting it to 2.6.17, but have work to do for this, because of the
>> changes for 2.6.17 in ext3;
>> now i
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've initial packaging done for 1.5.91 (alias 1.6 beta 4). This is for
> kernel 2.6.16; I'm
> porting it to 2.6.17, but have work to do for this, because of the
> changes for 2.6.17 in ext3;
> now is a good time to put it up and merge our wo
Hi,
I've initial packaging done for 1.5.91 (alias 1.6 beta 4). This is for
kernel 2.6.16; I'm
porting it to 2.6.17, but have work to do for this, because of the
changes for 2.6.17 in ext3;
now is a good time to put it up and merge our work :-)
The 2.6.16 code I have works for light use: survives
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 14:54 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[...]
> > There is already a project on Alioth
> >
> > http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-lustre/
> >
> > setup by Andreas Salomon (dilinger) which is probably a good place to
> > merge our efforts. We
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
I see from 237713 that you ITP'd lustre. Are you still actively working
on packaging Lustre?
I am packaging it as part of work, and have been porting it forward to
2.6.16 (amd64)
- currently building
14 matches
Mail list logo
