Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The fact that the packages contain files in common is why there is a > conflicts line. your patches to solve this problem are welcome for > review.
This appears to involve just krb5.conf.5. It seems to me that file should be in the krb5-config package as a union of the Heimdal and MIT pages, indicating which is which. (I need to know about both implementations.) Is there a reason not to do that, apart from maintenance grief? Would MIT be amenable to a re-write to make it easier to merge with Heimdal, assuming Heimdal is amenable? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
