Bug#301662: postinst prints garbled ps output for no reason

2005-03-27 Thread Eduard Bloch
Package: zaptel Version: 1:1.0.7-1 Severity: minor Hello, when I install the zaptel package, I get something that looks like ps aux output without line breaks on the console, during the postinst phase. Richte zaptel ein (1.0.7-1) ... PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 1 ? S 0:00 init [2] 2 ? SN 0:00

Bug#301662: postinst prints garbled ps output for no reason

2005-03-27 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
tag 301662 pending severity 301662 normal merge 301662 296958 thanks El dom, 27-03-2005 a las 17:09 +0200, Eduard Bloch escribi: Package: zaptel Version: 1:1.0.7-1 Severity: minor Hello, when I install the zaptel package, I get something that looks like ps aux output without line breaks

Bug#301662: postinst prints garbled ps output for no reason

2005-03-27 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Eduard Bloch [Sun, Mar 27 2005, 11:35:42PM]: And some of my changes are still usefull. Drop the dpatch requirement since it is not needed and use bzip2 (it is installed on most systems anyways). PS: I think you also do not need this lines since their products is not used

Bug#301662: postinst prints garbled ps output for no reason

2005-03-27 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [Sun, Mar 27 2005, 10:47:49PM]: lots of that Yup, this is a known bug on postinst file. Seems you don't have verified neither BTS nor SVN before sending the bugs ;-) I am mostly sorry for doubly spent time. Dude, how should I know about your

Bug#301662: postinst prints garbled ps output for no reason

2005-03-27 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
El dom, 27-03-2005 a las 23:35 +0200, Eduard Bloch escribi: #include hallo.h * Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [Sun, Mar 27 2005, 10:47:49PM]: lots of that Yup, this is a known bug on postinst file. Seems you don't have verified neither BTS nor SVN before sending the bugs ;-) I am

Bug#301662: postinst prints garbled ps output for no reason

2005-03-27 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [Sun, Mar 27 2005, 11:59:08PM]: Once again, sorry for the lost time. Okay, already forgotten. This was a good occasion to bring this topic to daylight on Debian-Devel, maintainer group information in packages generally needs more consistency.