On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:23, you wrote:
Hello,
This seems to be a int.size bug on 64bit architectures... I know that
mainline doesn't have this problem, and I *think* that I've got a
patch that fixes this.
Can you try installing the version of bittornado that is at
OK, I've had a couple of torrents running all night and no corruption
errors have appeared so I'm going to say that the updated package fixes
the bug.
Grahame
D'oh, not five minutes after I sent the last message and one of my
downloads corrupted.
So no the new package doesn't fix the bug.
On Saturday 09 April 2005 20:57, you wrote:
Hmm, I had a friend with an amd64 machine try this out and he had no
problems at all (using the updated bittornado I had you try), he got
download succeeded! with the md5sum: 21f473605f8aabb8bb54e2ebb09d170b
Micah
I was checking to see what
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005, Grahame White wrote:
On Saturday 09 April 2005 20:57, you wrote:
Hmm, I had a friend with an amd64 machine try this out and he had no
problems at all (using the updated bittornado I had you try), he got
download succeeded! with the md5sum:
Package: bittornado-gui
Version: 0.3.10-3
Severity: important
I've tried downloading files from a variety of different trackers and most of
downloads fail with a download corrupted error message. If the torrent is for
more than one file then I'm sometimes able to download each file individually
Hello,
This seems to be a int.size bug on 64bit architectures... I know that
mainline doesn't have this problem, and I *think* that I've got a
patch that fixes this.
Can you try installing the version of bittornado that is at
http://people.debian.org/~micah and see if you can reproduce the
On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:23, you wrote:
Hello,
This seems to be a int.size bug on 64bit architectures... I know that
mainline doesn't have this problem, and I *think* that I've got a
patch that fixes this.
Can you try installing the version of bittornado that is at
7 matches
Mail list logo