Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable

2005-05-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:17:27PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: tags 307816 -sid thanks That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report, the package in sarge is not really usable. Agreed. On Thu,

Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable

2005-05-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: ... So I suggest letting: * tetex-bin_2.0.2-29 (and packages built from it: libkpathsea3 and libkpathsea-dev) * cweb_3.64.debian-2 into sarge. I agree, this is a better solution than my suggestion. Julian cu Adrian --

Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable

2005-05-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: The new dummy cweb package which now depends on tetex-bin has been sitting in unstable for almost a month but has not yet migrated. So I suggest letting: * tetex-bin_2.0.2-29 (and packages built from it: libkpathsea3 and

Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable

2005-05-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: cweb Severity: grave Sid: cweb is a dummy package. cweb depends on tetex-bin. tetex-bin conflicts with cweb. cweb is therefore not installable Sarge: cweb is a real package. cweb recommends tetex-bin. tetex-bin conflicts with cweb. cweb is therefore hardly usable. It might be

Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable

2005-05-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: cweb Severity: grave It might be the best to simply remove the cweb package since the Conflicts/Replaces/Provides in tetex-bin should be enough. That doesn't provide a usable automatic transition from woody, though. --

Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable

2005-05-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
tags 307816 -sid thanks That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report, the package in sarge is not really usable. On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:16:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: cweb Severity:

Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable

2005-05-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
[To debian-release: this is about bug#307816 and bug#300768] On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: cweb Severity: grave Sid: cweb is a dummy package. cweb depends on tetex-bin. tetex-bin conflicts with cweb. cweb is therefore not installable

Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable

2005-05-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: tags 307816 -sid thanks That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report, the package in sarge is not really usable. Agreed. On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:16:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, May 05,