On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:17:27PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
tags 307816 -sid
thanks
That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report,
the package in sarge is not really usable.
Agreed.
On Thu,
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
...
So I suggest letting:
* tetex-bin_2.0.2-29 (and packages built from it: libkpathsea3 and
libkpathsea-dev)
* cweb_3.64.debian-2
into sarge.
I agree, this is a better solution than my suggestion.
Julian
cu
Adrian
--
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
The new dummy cweb package which now depends on tetex-bin has been
sitting in unstable for almost a month but has not yet migrated.
So I suggest letting:
* tetex-bin_2.0.2-29 (and packages built from it: libkpathsea3 and
Package: cweb
Severity: grave
Sid:
cweb is a dummy package.
cweb depends on tetex-bin.
tetex-bin conflicts with cweb.
cweb is therefore not installable
Sarge:
cweb is a real package.
cweb recommends tetex-bin.
tetex-bin conflicts with cweb.
cweb is therefore hardly usable.
It might be
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Package: cweb
Severity: grave
It might be the best to simply remove the cweb package since
the Conflicts/Replaces/Provides in tetex-bin should be enough.
That doesn't provide a usable automatic transition from woody, though.
--
tags 307816 -sid
thanks
That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report,
the package in sarge is not really usable.
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:16:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Package: cweb
Severity:
[To debian-release: this is about bug#307816 and bug#300768]
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Package: cweb
Severity: grave
Sid:
cweb is a dummy package.
cweb depends on tetex-bin.
tetex-bin conflicts with cweb.
cweb is therefore not installable
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
tags 307816 -sid
thanks
That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report,
the package in sarge is not really usable.
Agreed.
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:16:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 05,
8 matches
Mail list logo