On 24/05/2005-15:13, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:15:25AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
I first tried to add the same 3 lines with stable replaced by sarge,
leaving the previous ones uncommented, but this caused both aptitude and
apt-get to segfault. When I removed the
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:52:08PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi Bill,
I did not have such an error message from apt when it failed, only
Segmentation fault.
Oh, yes I forgot that part...
I think the release notes could mention this together with the Dynamic
MMap ran out of room error
Package: upgrade-reports
Archive date: Sat May 21 19:00:01 UTC 2005
Upgrade date: Sun May 22
uname -a: Linux sparc3 2.4.18 #2 Thu Apr 11 14:37:17 EDT 2002 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Method: aptitude -f --with-recommends dist-upgrade
Contents of /etc/apt/sources.list:
before upgrade:
deb
merge 310277 310375
quit
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:15:25AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Package: upgrade-reports
Archive date: Sat May 21 19:00:01 UTC 2005
Upgrade date: Sun May 22
uname -a: Linux sparc3 2.4.18 #2 Thu Apr 11 14:37:17 EDT 2002 sparc64
GNU/Linux
Method: aptitude -f
On Monday 23 May 2005 17:01, you wrote:
The work-around is to do
echo 'APT::Cache-Limit 25165824;' /etc/apt/apt.conf
How did you get to the value of 25165824?
I've currently put a comment about this in the Release Notes with a value
of 1000. Does that need to be increased?
Cheers,
FJP
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 05:15:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2005 17:01, you wrote:
The work-around is to do
echo 'APT::Cache-Limit 25165824;' /etc/apt/apt.conf
How did you get to the value of 25165824?
I've currently put a comment about this in the Release Notes with a
On Monday 23 May 2005 17:31, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 05:15:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2005 17:01, you wrote:
The work-around is to do
echo 'APT::Cache-Limit 25165824;' /etc/apt/apt.conf
How did you get to the value of 25165824?
I've
7 matches
Mail list logo
