Hi,
FWIW, I use libdbi with RefDB (http://refdb.sourceforge.net). I would
like to see both of them in Debian. I'm happy to package RefDB, but of
course that depends on libdbi being there.
How about if you (David) or me ([EMAIL PROTECTED], if you let me do an
NMU or make me co-maintainer)
Jeremy,
That sounds great. I will look at the existing bugs and 0.8.1 packaging
this weekend and get you set up as a co-maintainer. I'll email you in a
few days and we can go from there.
thanks,
David
--
David Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neon Goat Productions
http://www.neongoat.com
--
To
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 07:06:57PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I'd like to add to this that I am the maintainer of libapache-mod-sql
that depends on libdbi0 and needs libdbi-dev to build. libapache-mod-sql
produces libapache-mod-sql-dbi and libapache2-mod-sql-dbi. This is
currently in SID.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I'd like to add to this that I am the maintainer of libapache-mod-sql
that depends on libdbi0 and needs libdbi-dev to build. libapache-mod-sql
produces libapache-mod-sql-dbi and libapache2-mod-sql-dbi. This is
currently in SID.
To me, it's very
severity 312115 normal
tags 312115 +unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
there's no activity on this bug for about 15 months, and I think the
problem was the test program of Markus Kolb. Because he did now answer
anymore I think this bug is not so important and i downgrade it to
normal, because I think
severity 312115 grave
tags 312115 -unreproducible
thanks
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:27:05PM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
there's no activity on this bug for about 15 months, and I think the
problem was the test program of Markus Kolb.
You *think* this, or you *know* this? If you have another
6 matches
Mail list logo
