Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-05-09 Thread Simon Walter
package mailscanner tags 313145 confirmed thanks will be relevant again if mailscanner makes it into the next stable release -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: Any chance a volatile package can be made available? I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it didn't made it into the last stable release? Acceptance rules says nothing against this... Can someone

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 12:11:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: Any chance a volatile package can be made available? I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it didn't made it into the last stable

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread George B.
2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph l...@lupe-christoph.de: On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 12:11:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: No, sorry. No new packages. Makes sense. For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread simon . walter
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:33:34PM +0100, Simon Walter wrote: Any chance a volatile package can be made available? I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package into volatile if it didn't made it into the last stable release? Acceptance rules says nothing against this... Can someone

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +, George B. wrote: 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph l...@lupe-christoph.de: For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . Good point. What is the process to make the request? Should I file a new bug? They haven't started lenny-backports yet.

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17-02-2009 09:34, Lupe Christoph wrote: On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +, George B. wrote: 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph l...@lupe-christoph.de: For me, this looks like a case for http://www.backports.org/ . Good point. What is the

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-17 Thread Alexander Wirt
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) schrieb am Tuesday, den 17. February 2009: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17-02-2009 09:34, Lupe Christoph wrote: On Tuesday, 2009-02-17 at 11:35:09 +, George B. wrote: 2009/2/17 Lupe Christoph l...@lupe-christoph.de: For me,

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-16 Thread George B.
Hello, The mailscanner package was removed from the new Debian Stable release (Lenny). :-( Any chance a volatile package can be made available? Thanks, George. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#313145: Support for debian-volatile

2009-02-16 Thread Simon Walter
Hello George B. i93.b...@gmail.com writes: The mailscanner package was removed from the new Debian Stable release (Lenny). :-( Mailscanner was removed from stable because of #506353[1]. Any chance a volatile package can be made available? I don't know. Is it even possible to get a package