Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-31 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:58 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all the build

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-31 Thread Steve Langasek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:33:40AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:58 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-29 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dissabte 29 Octubre 2005 07:11, Ted Kisner va escriure: OK. But does it still spew warnings and crash as described by Leopold? It displays the following errors, but does not crash. This may simply because I've not tried to *do* anything with the program. Is there a sample file

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-29 Thread Ted Kisner
On Saturday 29 October 2005 02:52, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: As I aid before, if I open the file:/usr/share/geomview/data/Antenna.geom I receive a coredump and this messages: sorry, I missed that. I get the same crash when I open that file. -Ted -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 04:48, Steve M. Robbins va escriure: On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:24:13AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Greetings, I'm wondering whether the last four months have provided enough time to confirm this is still a bug deserving of the grave status. Because of

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hello, On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 06:16:24PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: I have updated and upgrade today, and I have installed geomview: ii geomview 1.8.1-9 interactive geometry viewing program I'm using Nvidia driver well configured and no graphics problem I have by now.

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 19:10, Steve M. Robbins va escriure: Hello, On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 06:16:24PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: I have updated and upgrade today, and I have installed geomview: ii geomview 1.8.1-9 interactive geometry viewing program I'm using

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 08:44:17PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: 1. apt-get source geomview 2. build a new deb with current libs and compiler tool chain 3. install and run new geomview well, I don't have much time now, but I have problem building the packege: I have done 1 and 2

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Ted Kisner
I installed the build-deps and ran dpkg-buildpackage. It died for me as well. The output is attached. -Ted On Friday 28 October 2005 11:44, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 19:10, Steve M. Robbins va escriure: Hello, On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 06:16:24PM +0200,

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Ted Kisner
hmm, looks like it is complaining about the OpenGL dev libraries- I'll install and try again... -Ted On Friday 28 October 2005 12:24, Ted Kisner wrote: I installed the build-deps and ran dpkg-buildpackage. It died for me as well. The output is attached. -Ted On Friday 28 October 2005

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all the build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs the nvidia-glx-dev. I have built the package and installed with the box updated today. I have run again the geomview and it crash in the same place

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all the build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs the nvidia-glx-dev. The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-dev

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 21:59, Artur R. Czechowski va escriure: On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all the build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs the

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Ted Kisner
On Friday 28 October 2005 13:02, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-dev on amd64 and on other platforms it builds succesfully without nvidia-glx-dev? I think it's because I happen to be using the nvidia X driver and GL libraries... -Ted --

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:14:27PM -0700, Ted Kisner wrote: On Friday 28 October 2005 13:02, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-dev on amd64 and on other platforms it builds succesfully without nvidia-glx-dev? I think it's because I happen to

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all the build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:39:07PM -0700, Ted Kisner wrote: after installing nvidia-glx-dev, I can successfully build the package and install. Build log is attached. I can run the program and use the menus, etc. Not sure what to do with the program, so I can't really test anything ;-)

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Ted Kisner
OK. But does it still spew warnings and crash as described by Leopold? It displays the following errors, but does not crash. This may simply because I've not tried to *do* anything with the program. Is there a sample file somewhere that I could try to open, to confirm that it crashes?

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-27 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:24:13AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Greetings, I'm wondering whether the last four months have provided enough time to confirm this is still a bug deserving of the grave status. Because of this bug, geomview has been removed from testing, which nearly derailed

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-26 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Greetings, I'm wondering whether the last four months have provided enough time to confirm this is still a bug deserving of the grave status. Because of this bug, geomview has been removed from testing, which nearly derailed the transition of about 40 packages today. Is it time to mark this