On 03.08.05 Mickael Profeta ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
1. In postinst you have code to make the package installing on teTeX
1.0.7. sarge has 2.0.2 and etch will have 3.0.x. Hence I don't think
it does make sense to keep that code. The postrm script is
incompatible to the teTeX packages
Package: pts-tetex-cm-super
Version: 0.3.3-6
Severity: normal
Hi Mickael,
Many thanks for uploading that package to Debian and of course to
Peter for initial packaging!
There are at least two things I don't like. Although these are rather
wishlist I'd like you to treat them as bugs.
1. In
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've no clue if one can convert an arch any package into an arch all
simply by reuploading. It should be written anywhere deep in the
docs.
Yes, that is easy. Just bump the version number and make the change in
debian/control, and everything else will
Scripsit Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've no clue if one can convert an arch any package into an arch all
simply by reuploading. It should be written anywhere deep in the
docs.
Yes, that is easy. Just bump the version number and make the change in
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:54:07PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
In order to be completely correct, the package-building commands in
debian/rules should also be moved from the binary-arch target to
binary-indep.
Thanks for help and comments on the package.
I will certainly make a new upload
Hi,
1. In postinst you have code to make the package installing on teTeX
1.0.7. sarge has 2.0.2 and etch will have 3.0.x. Hence I don't think
it does make sense to keep that code. The postrm script is
incompatible to the teTeX packages from woody anyway.
That's true. When I start building the
6 matches
Mail list logo
