On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:23:02PM -0500, Greg Norris wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:49:04AM +, W. Borgert wrote:
The README should be removed, as it is absolutely redundant,
apart from the word filter :-)
True, but it's an expected (and harmless) component from the upstream
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:50:09AM +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:23:02PM -0500, Greg Norris wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:49:04AM +, W. Borgert wrote:
The README should be removed, as it is absolutely redundant,
apart from the word filter :-)
True, but
Quoting Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't see a link to the discussion.
The discussion started with this mail:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00705.html
It gives some examples of redundant content of README files.
A random selection of sourceforge projects would
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:50:09AM +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:23:02PM -0500, Greg Norris wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:49:04AM +, W. Borgert wrote:
The README should be removed, as it is absolutely redundant,
apart from the word filter :-)
True, but
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:49:04AM +, W. Borgert wrote:
The package description says:
This program is a simple that reads the output of the 'diff' program,
and produces a histogram of the total number of lines that were changed.
It is useful for scanning a patch file to see which files
Package: diffstat
Version: 1.39-1
Severity: minor
The package description says:
This program is a simple that reads the output of the 'diff' program,
and produces a histogram of the total number of lines that were changed.
It is useful for scanning a patch file to see which files were changed.
6 matches
Mail list logo
