* Clint Adams:
But you wouldn't object to a patch in principle, right?
Nope.
There seems to be a problem: The on-disk lock region format changes.
This means that it's not worth the trouble, I guess.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
But you wouldn't object to a patch in principle, right?
Nope.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Clint Adams:
It would be desirable to add NPTL versions of the DSOs. The NPTL
cross-process mutexes are more scalable than Berkeley DB's approach.
(Traditional POSIX mutexes, before NPTL, are single-process, that's why
they are needed.)
When the Debian glibc packages drop LinuxThreads
It would be desirable to add NPTL versions of the DSOs. The NPTL
cross-process mutexes are more scalable than Berkeley DB's approach.
(Traditional POSIX mutexes, before NPTL, are single-process, that's why
they are needed.)
When the Debian glibc packages drop LinuxThreads support entirely,
4 matches
Mail list logo
