Ah, that's a piece of history! :-D
Thanks for reminding and closing.
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019, 22:21 Silas S. Brown Hi Hilmar, yes it's OK to close the bug now, sorry I forgot to reply
> before.
>
> Silas
>
> --
> Silas S Brown http://people.ds.cam.ac.uk/ssb22
>
> "Man prefers to believe what he
Hi Hilmar, yes it's OK to close the bug now, sorry I forgot to reply before.
Silas
--
Silas S Brown http://people.ds.cam.ac.uk/ssb22
"Man prefers to believe what he prefers to be true." - Francis Bacon
On 07.01.06 18:18, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
Hi Danai, hi Silas,
https://bugs.debian.org/324542
> I have updated the latex-cjk packages, and instead of ttf2tfm/ttf2pk
> it uses Type1 .pfb fonts (also provided in Debian packages).
> I have tried a few example files with "dvips -Pdfaxlo", and it
On 07.01.06 18:18, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
Hi Danai, hi Silas,
https://bugs.debian.org/324542
> I have updated the latex-cjk packages, and instead of ttf2tfm/ttf2pk
> it uses Type1 .pfb fonts (also provided in Debian packages).
> I have tried a few example files with "dvips -Pdfaxlo", and it
Hi Silas!
I have updated the latex-cjk packages, and instead of ttf2tfm/ttf2pk
it uses Type1 .pfb fonts (also provided in Debian packages).
I have tried a few example files with dvips -Pdfaxlo, and it seems
to work. Well, the Type1 fonts are not optimised for 204*96dpi, but
at least it's not
5 matches
Mail list logo
