On Dec 07, Jacobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > %e does not really work, and this has nothing to do with this closed bug.
> Yes it does have to do. The initial post was:
No, it does not. Do not pretend that you know how udev works better than
I do. This problem is that the user did not load ide-c
> %e does not really work, and this has nothing to do with this closed bug.
Yes it does have to do. The initial post was:
> udev is creating a couple of symlinks which seem to be incorrect. My
> system has a DVD drive on /dev/hdc and a DVD rewritable on /dev/hdd.
>
> Previously, with udev 0.068
On Nov 25, Jacobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same happens here, all /dev/dvd /dev/cdrom and /dev/cdrw link to /dev/hdd
%e does not really work, and this has nothing to do with this closed bug.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Same happens here, all /dev/dvd /dev/cdrom and /dev/cdrw link to /dev/hdd
I would expect at least some /dev/cdrom0 /dev/cdrom1 or something, but
no.
/dev/hdc is a CD ReWritter. /dev/hdd is a DVD Reader
[/usr/src/linux]$ sudo cdrom_id /dev/hdc
ID_CDROM=1
ID_CDROM_CD_R=1
ID_CDROM_CD_RW=1
ID_CDROM_
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 09:23 am, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 24, Rick Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please check what cdrom_id /dev/hdc and cdrom_id /dev/hdd report.
> >
> > I'm not sure this is what you want but doing ls -l shows the following:
>
> No, I mean the /sbin/cdrom_id c
On Aug 24, Rick Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please check what cdrom_id /dev/hdc and cdrom_id /dev/hdd report.
> I'm not sure this is what you want but doing ls -l shows the following:
No, I mean the /sbin/cdrom_id command.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 09:10 am, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 24, Rick Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is this by design? Should udev not be creating any symlinks to hdc???
>
> Please check what cdrom_id /dev/hdc and cdrom_id /dev/hdd report.
I'm not sure this is what you want but doi
On Aug 24, Rick Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this by design? Should udev not be creating any symlinks to hdc???
Please check what cdrom_id /dev/hdc and cdrom_id /dev/hdd report.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: udev
Version: 0.068-2
Severity: normal
udev is creating a couple of symlinks which seem to be incorrect. My
system has a DVD drive on /dev/hdc and a DVD rewritable on /dev/hdd.
Previously, with udev 0.068-1, the following symlinks were created:
/dev/cdrom -> hdc
/dev/dv
9 matches
Mail list logo
