* John W. Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-14 02:07]:
On 10-Sep-2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| John, could you please confirm that this would fix the bug?
Looking at the code, I think it will avoid the problem.
Should we then file a bug report against the libc6 package requesting the
On 15-Sep-2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| * John W. Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-14 02:07]:
|
| On 10-Sep-2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
|
| | John, could you please confirm that this would fix the bug?
|
| Looking at the code, I think it will avoid the problem.
|
| Should we then
On 10-Sep-2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| John, could you please confirm that this would fix the bug?
Looking at the code, I think it will avoid the problem.
Thanks,
jwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 05:08:21PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
On 9-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
| Is libstdc++ also completely compatible? Have there been absolutely
| no changes that could affect layout of class members?
|
| This question is no longer a concern since my tests
* John W. Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-09 13:22]:
On 9-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
| Too bad :. Did you submit bugs to the gcc or Debian BTS (I looked
| rapidly and did not find a relevant bug) ?
No, sorry, I didn't.
It seems to be a glibc bug. According to:
On 7-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
| octave needs to be recompiled with g++ 4.0 and a newer libhdf5:
The last time I tried compiling Octave with g++ 4.0 (actually 4.0.1),
Octave failed several of its tests. So maybe g++ 4.0 is not quite
ready yet?
jwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
The last time I tried compiling Octave with g++ 4.0 (actually 4.0.1),
Octave failed several of its tests. So maybe g++ 4.0 is not quite
ready yet?
Too bad :. Did you submit bugs to the gcc or Debian BTS (I looked
rapidly and did not find a relevant bug) ? If yes, could you please
provide
On ven, 2005-09-09 at 16:21 +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
I am currently trying an octave package rebuild with the latest g++ 3.4
and 4.0 available in Debian. Is the test suite integrated in the
package build ?
It seems so. During the build with g++ 4.0 I get only 2 failures out of
1200
On ven, 2005-09-09 at 16:21 +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
I am currently trying an octave package rebuild with the latest g++ 3.4
and 4.0 available in Debian.
Here is the build with g++-3.4. It is worse than with g++-4.0 (6
failures instead of 2).
$ g++ -v
Reading specs from
On 9-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
| Too bad :. Did you submit bugs to the gcc or Debian BTS (I looked
| rapidly and did not find a relevant bug) ?
No, sorry, I didn't.
| g++ 3.4 could also be used as a fallback since it is ABI-compatible with
| g++ 4.0.
Is libstdc++ also completely
| Too bad :. Did you submit bugs to the gcc or Debian BTS (I looked
| rapidly and did not find a relevant bug) ?
No, sorry, I didn't.
I guess it would be time consuming to isolate the failure and produce a
small and self-contained test case of bad code generation.
| g++ 3.4 could also be
On 9-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
| Is libstdc++ also completely compatible? Have there been absolutely
| no changes that could affect layout of class members?
|
| This question is no longer a concern since my tests have shown that g++
| 3.4 is worse than g++ 4.0.
But unless we are
On 9-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
| Here is the build with g++-3.4. It is worse than with g++-4.0 (6
| failures instead of 2).
Odd. My results were:
3.3: all tests pass
3.4: all tests pass
4.0: 1 failed (FAIL: octave.test/arith/coth-1.m)
My system is Debian testing, updated to
13 matches
Mail list logo
